Individual performance in organizations
Buy ready-to-submit essays. No Plagiarism Guarantee!
Note: Every paper is crafted by professional human writers to guarantee authenticity and originality.
Need Help Writing an Essay?
Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper.
Write My Essay For Me
Individual performance in organizations is in most cases depended on exchanges where inducements of motivation are offered for the productivity of the organization’s employees. In this case, the utilization of inducements, which in most cases are related to finance, is commonly used on both the agendas of practitioners and researchers in the matters of human resources. There are different kinds of inducements for performance some of which include setting of objectives and goals, paying of incentives, enrichment of jobs, and participation. Researchers into the issue have found that paying of incentives is one of the most critical motivational inducements in most associations that desire to amplify the performance of their workers. As it follows, more and more researchers are supporting the need for the use of incentives in increasing productivity in organizations.
However, despite the fact that most studies point to the beneficial effects of incentives, some have argued against it. They argue against the basis of the theory that employees at all stages can be satisfied and motivated to perform more by the use of incentive programs or reward systems, arguing that workers who expect external rewards in exchange for performance perform poorly when compared to those who perform without expecting any rewards. Other researchers point out that, programs for motivation or reward have a maximum half-life of five years, after which it expires and organizations have to get rid of it.
The effectiveness of motivation
Other than the issue that the debate on the effectiveness of motivation or reward systems on the performance of employees, it has also been noted that other debates exist on the issue of the effects of these incentives or reward systems on the attitudes of the employees towards their job. Furthermore, there has been little o no evidence at all linking motivational schemes or reward systems to job satisfaction of employees. As a result, this paper will seek to address these issues through the evaluation and study of numerous researches and studies to establish the impact of the motivational scheme on a number of aspects in job satisfaction in Singapore. Through a wide and deep study of job satisfaction of employees, after and before the use of incentives and reward systems, the paper looks at the effects of a number of incentives or reward mechanisms on job satisfaction of a number of employees all derived from studies on employees from Singapore.
The incentive behind this paper results from the need to explore an essential dependent variable that resulted from a recent study that suggested that it is an essential factor for a firm to engage in motivational or reward systems for the success of the organization in the service industry. Choosing Singapore as a country of interest in this study does not stem from any special circumstance other than a matter of choice and convenience. As the country, just like many others globally, enter the limiting economic times, more organizations are turning into reward and incentive programs as a way of improving productivity and profitability. The study, therefore, hopes to find out what kind of incentives are used in Singapore to encourage employee productivity, and whether these incentives are effective in improving performance, and whether they are related in any way to job satisfaction of the employees.
To achieve this, the study will adopt a research methodology, which will include an intense and longitudinal survey of the available literature and surveys on the issue to come up with a conclusive comparison and conclusion. Through the study, the research paper will try to come to a conclusive answer to the issues at hand.
References
| Stringer C, Didham J & Theivananthampillai P 2011, Motivation, pay satisfaction, and job satisfaction of front- line employees. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management vol. 8, no.2. | Article |
| Salimaki A & Jamsen S 2010, Perceptions of politics and fairness in merit pay, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 25, no. 3. | Journal article |
| De Jong PJ, Hartog DN 2007, How leaders influence employee’ innovative behavior, European Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 10, no. 1. | Research paper |
| Martins LP 2007, A holistic framework for the strategic management of first tier managers, Management Decision, vol. 45, no. 3. | Research paper |
| Ooi KB, et al, 2007, Does TQM influence employee’s satisfaction? An empirical case analysis, International Journal of Quality &Reliability Management, vol. 24, no. 1. | Case study |
| Turkyilmaz a, Akman G, Ozkan C & Pastuszak Z 2011, Empirical study for public sector employee loyalty and satisfaction, Industrial Management & Data Systems vol. 111, no. 5. | Research paper |
| Slatten T 2009, The effect of managerial practice on employee- perceived service quality: the role of emotional satisfaction, Managing Service quality, vol. 19, no. 4. | Research paper |
| Bordin C, Bartram t & Casimir G 2007, The antecedents and consequences of psychological empowerment among Singaporean IT employees, Management Research News, vol. 30, no. 1. | Research paper |
| Ghebregiorgis F & Kartsten L 2007, Employee reactions to human resource management and performance in a developing country: Evidence from Eritrea, Personnel Review, vol. 36, no. 5. | Research paper |
| Yeo RK 2007, Organizational learning in representative Singapore public organizations: A study of its contribution to the understanding of management in Singapore, International Journal of Public sector Management, vol. 20, no. 5. | Journal article |
| Rodrigues CA 2007, Cybernetic- scanning management: Utilizing people’s organization’s energies to attain greater efficiency, Kybernetes, vol. 36, no. 1. | Conceptual paper |
| Rudge A 2011, Birmingham city council links increased contribution and outcomes to reward and recognition: system raises productivity and improves performance, Human resource Management International Digest, Vol. 19, no. 5. | Case study |
| Zhou Y, Zhang Y & Montoro- Sanchez A 2011, Utilitarianism or romanticism: the effect of rewards on employees’ innovative behavior, International Journal of Manpower, vol. 19. no. 5. | Research paper |
| Chang TJ, Yeh SP & Yeh IJ 2007, The effects of joint reward system in new product development, International Journal of Manpower, vol. 28, no. ¾. | Research paper |
| Choy WKW, Ramuruth P & Lee BE 2010, The people’s Republic of China, the ASEAN and Singapore: A matter of economic cooperation and differentiated management, Chinese Management Studies, Vol. 4, no. 2. | Conceptual paper |
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH GRADE VALLEY TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT
The post THE EFFECT OF REWARD SYSTEMS PAPER appeared first on Brook Writers.

- Confidentiality & Authenticity Guaranteed
- Plagiarism Free answers Guarantee
- We Guarantee Timely Delivery of All essays
- Quality & Reliability
- Papers Written from Scratch and to Your exact Instructions
- Qualified Writers Only
- We offer Direct Contact With Your Writer
- 24/7 Customer Support



