How can the Greater Anchorage (Alaska) and Barnes Hospital (Missouri) courts take two nearly identical tax laws, apply them to situations with virtually identical facts, and arrive at opposite conclusions? Are their decisions fair?
Answer questions on page 458, questions 1-4 : Barnes Hospital v. Collector of Revenue 1. How can the Greater Anchorage (Alaska) and Barnes Hospital (Missouri) courts take two nearly identical tax laws, apply them to situations with virtually identical facts,…