Case study 2: collaboration systems at isuzu australia limited

Points: 150

Case Study 2: Collaboration Systems at Isuzu Australia Limited

Criteria

 

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

 

Fair

70-79% C

 

Proficient

80-89% B

 

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Summarize the main reason(s) that prompted Isuzu Australia Limited (IAL) to use collaboration technologies.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely summarized the main reason(s) that prompted Isuzu Australia Limited (IAL) to use collaboration technologies.

Insufficiently summarized the main reason(s) that prompted Isuzu Australia Limited (IAL) to use collaboration technologies.

Partially summarized the main reason(s) that prompted Isuzu Australia Limited (IAL) to use collaboration technologies.

Satisfactorily summarized the main reason(s) that prompted Isuzu Australia Limited (IAL) to use collaboration technologies.

Thoroughly summarized the main reason(s) that prompted Isuzu Australia Limited (IAL) to use collaboration technologies.

2. Identify the platform that IAL chose as an online portal and content management system, and describe the main reason(s) why IAL chose such a specific platform.
Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely identified the platform that IAL chose as an online portal and content management system; did not submit or incompletely described the main reason(s) why IAL chose such a specific platform.

Insufficiently identified the platform that IAL chose as an online portal and content management system; insufficiently described the main reason(s) why IAL chose such a specific platform.

Partially identified the platform that IAL chose as an online portal and content management system; partially described the main reason(s) why IAL chose such a specific platform.

Satisfactorily identified the platform that IAL chose as an online portal and content management system; satisfactorily described the main reason(s) why IAL chose such a specific platform.

Thoroughly identified the platform that IAL chose as an online portal and content management system; thoroughly described the main reason(s) why IAL chose such a specific platform.

3. Discuss the significant attributes of a wiki, and describe the overall manner in which IAL uses wikis for its internal collaboration.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely discussed the significant attributes of a wiki; did not submit or incompletely described the overall manner in which IAL uses wikis for its internal collaboration.

Insufficiently discussed the significant attributes of a wiki; insufficiently described the overall manner in which IAL uses wikis for its internal collaboration.

Partially discussed the significant attributes of a wiki; partially described the overall manner in which IAL uses wikis for its internal collaboration.

Satisfactorilydiscussed the significant attributes of a wiki; satisfactorilydescribed the overall manner in which IAL uses wikis for its internal collaboration.

Thoroughly discussed the significant attributes of a wiki; thoroughly described the overall manner in which IAL uses wikis for its internal collaboration.

4. Speculate on the main challenges that IAL could face when implementing groupware, and suggest one (1) step that IAL could take in order to mitigate the challenges in question.

Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely speculated on the main challenges that IAL could face when implementing groupware; did not submit or incompletely suggested one (1) step that IAL could take in order to mitigate the challenges in question.

Insufficiently speculated on the main challenges that IAL could face when implementing groupware; insufficiently suggested one (1) step that IAL could take in order to mitigate the challenges in question.

Partially speculated on the main challenges that IAL could face when implementing groupware; partially suggested one (1) step that IAL could take in order to mitigate the challenges in question.

Satisfactorily speculated on the main challenges that IAL could face when implementing groupware; satisfactorily suggested one (1) step that IAL could take in order to mitigate the challenges in question.

Thoroughly speculated on the main challenges that IAL could face when implementing groupware; thoroughly suggested one (1) step that IAL could take in order to mitigate the challenges in question.

5. 3 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high- quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high- quality choices.

6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present

7-8 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present